🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $27,000 annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now the government is shut down because political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from both employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income must contribute approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you compare that with what the typical American pays. I know dozens of businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like many federal military, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to workers' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances is that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.