🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed decision, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to use a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include several five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three decision, handed down on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to lift a lower court's ruling that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Court's Reasoning

The district court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, creating much confusion and disrupting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its ruling.

The district court had determined that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to employ the boundaries drawn after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissent

In a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's action. She contended that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The court's action occurs during a countrywide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican control. Typically, map-drawing takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several more GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, in response, have responded with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees representation aligned with his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

Conversely, opposition party leaders criticized the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party election organization.

A top House leader stated the court had yet again damaged its credibility by approving a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.